《近代史研究》2007年第5期
2020-10-21 12:19:23   来源：中国社会科学院近代史研究所    点击：

点击阅读全本

一、中文目录
 

1 百年研究成就的总结 茅家琦; 1-3
2 断代通史著作的成功尝试 龚书铎;张昭军; 3-7
3 尊重历史真实 着力学术创新 李文海; 7-10
4 实现了本所几代人的夙愿 曾业英; 10-13
5 贯通近代百年历史的鸿篇巨制 熊月之; 14-17
6 构建兼容并包的中国近代史学科体系 罗志田; 17-18
7 通史贵在“通” 马敏; 18-21
8 以通史的眼光撰写和阅读近代史 桑兵; 21-23
9 百年国史有新篇 郭世佑; 23-25
10 傅斯年“史学只是史料学”再析 桑兵; 26-41+160
11 学术调融与晚清礼学的思想活力 罗检秋; 42-58+160-161
12 “矛盾政策”中找寻出路:四届五中全会前后的胡汉民与西南时局 罗敏; 59-78+161
13 读冯客《近代中国之种族观念》 谢维; 79-90
14 史料的主观解读与史家的价值判断——复房德邻先生兼答贾小叶先生 茅海建; 91-107
15 2006年中国近代史论著目录 刘丽;胡槿;杜华; 108-156
16 《晚清民国经济史丛书》出版 闵杰; 157  

 

二、中文内容提要

 

傅斯年“史学只是史料学”再析　　桑 兵（中山大学历史系教授）
［内容提要］傅斯年提出“近代史学只是史料学”，始于《历史语言研究所工作之旨趣》，完整的表述，却是《史学方法导论》。该讲义可能并未完稿，但其中重要的几讲已有傅斯年本人所写的系统文本作为依据，有助于理解其近乎口号的观念，避免断章取义或隔义附会。以比较求近真与头绪，是将史学与史料学有机联系的关键。而把握扩张史料与新旧史料、整理材料与“聪明考证”、“东方学之正统在中国”与“虏学”、“全汉”、以及考订与“大事”的关系，可以寻其本意，扩张积极效应。
［关键词］傅斯年|史料学|史学方法导论

 

学术调融与晚清礼学的思想活力　　罗检秋（中国社会科学院近代史研究所研究员）
［内容提要］关于清代礼学，现有研究偏重于乾嘉之际汉、宋对峙的背景下，一些汉学家“以礼代理”的倾向及其考礼成就和议礼主张。而同样值得注意的是，嘉道以降，一些调和汉、宋的学者也考礼、议礼和释礼，推动了礼学进一步发展。比如，阮元等人彰显礼学的社会性；郭嵩焘阐发“缘情制礼”的思想；曾国藩、俞樾注重礼学的经世价值。风气所及，一些礼学家发扬儒家“因时制礼”的思想，关注礼俗改良。他们批评压迫女性的礼教，主张简化婚、丧、葬、祭的礼仪，甚至像孙诒让那样，以《周礼》为依据，提出全面改革礼制的措施。在晚清汉、宋调和的潮流中，礼学也呈现出鲜明的思想活力。
［关键词］晚清礼学|汉宋调和|缘情制礼|礼俗改良

 

“矛盾政策”中找寻出路：四届五中全会前后的胡汉民与西南时局　　罗 敏（中国社会科学院近代史研究所副研究员）
［内容提要］本文主要利用新近出版的《胡汉民未刊往来函电稿》，辅以相关档案、报刊资料，尝试跳脱已有研究循单一线索演进的模式，通过还原国民党四届五中全会前后胡汉民及其周围相关人群的活动轨迹，呈现西南内部错综复杂的政治生态环境，揭示胡汉民等人在尴尬境遇下的矛盾心情。1934年年中，为应对西南的被动局面，胡汉民欲于“矛盾政策”中找寻出路。既欲从军事上攻蒋，又想向蒋找出路；既欲倒蒋以抗日，又思假日以倒蒋。“内忧”（对实力派而言）相煎益急，“外患”（对蒋介石而言）又侵逼不已。胡汉民于重重矛盾环绕纠缠中，身不由己。无奈之中，胡欲借五全大会召开之机，“从党找办法”，“以党取攻势”。未料，“自行开会”之举，锋芒所向，未曾伤及中央，却几令西南“散伙”。这一情形应是西南反蒋“表象”背后的真实底蕴。
［关键词］胡汉民|蒋介石|陈济棠|国民党五全大会|中央地方关系

 

史料的主观解读与史家的价值判断——复房德邻先生兼答贾小叶先生　　茅海建（北京大学历史系教授）
［内容提要］本文是对房德邻先生、贾小叶先生论文的回复。其中引用了总理衙门章京上书、刘大鹏日记以及“康有为自写年谱手稿本”等材料，并解读《直报》的报道，进一步说明本文作者在《“公车上车”考证补》的论点。本文还指出了史料解读的主观性及史家对史学的应取态度。
［关键词］公车上书|康有为|刘大鹏|《我史》|《直报》

 

百年研究成就的总结　　茅家琦

 

断代通史著作的成功尝试　　龚书铎　张昭军

尊重历史真实 着力学术创新　　李文海

实现了本所几代人的夙愿　　曾业英

贯通近代百年历史的鸿篇巨制　　熊月之

构建兼容并包的中国近代史学科体系　　罗志田

通史贵在“通”　　马敏

以通史的眼光撰写和阅读近代史　　桑兵

百年国史有新篇　　郭世佑

读冯客《近代中国之种族观念》　　谢维

 

2006年中国近代史论著目录　　刘丽　胡槿　杜华

《晚清民国经济史丛书》出版　　闵杰

 

三、英文目录提要

Modern Chinese History Studies No.5, 2007

Discussion in Writing on General Modern Chinese History edited by Professor Zhang Haipeng

A Summary of the Scholarly Achievements of the Past Hundred Years Mao Jiaqi (1)

A Successful Experiment in Periodic History Gong Shuduo, Zhang Zhaojun (3)

Respecting Historical Truth, Emphasizing Academic Innovation Li Wenhai (7)

The Realization of Our Institute’s Long-cherished Dream Zeng Yeying (10)

A Monumental Work Weaving Together One Hundred Years of Modern History Xiong Yuezhi (14)

Building an All-encompassing Framework for the Field of Modern Chinese History Luo Zhitian (17)

The Key to General History is Continuity Ma Min (18)

Applying a General History Outlook to Writing and Reading Modern History Sang Bing(21)

A New Work on the Past One Hundred Years of National History Guo Shiyou (23)

Re-analysis of Fu Sinian’s View that “The Study of History Is Only the Study of Historical Materials”

Sang Bing (26)

Fu Sinian’s view that “the study of history is only the study of historical materials” originally appeared in his article “The Objectives of the Institute of History and Philology,” but its complete explanation was presented in An Introduction to Historical Research Methods. The Introduction may be an unfinished draft, but several important chapters are based on systematic texts written by Fu Sinian himself. These texts can help us understand his almost slogan-like viewpoint and avoid quoting it out of context or making irrelevant comparisons. Using comparison to pursue clues and approximate truths is the key to intrinsically linking history with historical materials. And we can look for its original idea and enlarge its positive effects by mastering the relationships between extended historical materials and new and old historical data, between re-organizing historical materials and “doing brilliant evidentiary studies”, between “Orientalist arthodox in China” and “Luxue” (虏学) versus “Quanhan” (全汉), and between textual research and“great events”.

Academic Coordination and the Intellectual Vigor of Rites Studies in the Late Qing Period

Luo Jianqiu (42)

Existing research on Rites Studies in the Qing period lays particular stress on the efforts of some Han Learning scholars to “use Rites Studies to replace Song Learning” in the context of the split between Han Learning and Song Learning during the Qianlong and Jiaqing periods. Research also stresses the achievements of those scholars in research on ritual, as well as the opinions they espoused on ritual. Another point that deserves our attention is that since the Jiaqing and Daoguang periods, some scholars who tried to reconcile Han and Song Learning also researched, discussed and explained ritual and promoted the further development of Rites Studies. For example, Ruan Yuan and others stressed the social nature of Rites Studies; Guo Songtao explained the concept of “fixing ritual according to sentiment”; Zeng Guofan and Yu Yue paid attention to practical values in Rites Studies. In this atmosphere, some Rites Studies scholars promoted the idea of “fixing ritual in accordance with the times” and paid attention to the reform of etiquette and custom. They criticized feudal ethics that oppressed women and advocated the simplification of marriage, death, burial and sacrifice rituals. Some even suggested measures to completely reform ritual systems, such as Sun Yirang’s proposal based on The Rites of Zhou. Rites Studies displayed brilliant intellectual vigor during this late Qing movement to reconcile Han and Song Learning.

Looking for a Way Out amid “Contradictory Policies”: Hu Hanmin and the Political Situation in the Southwest before and after the Fifth Plenary Session of the Fourth National Congress of the Guomindang

Luo Min (59)

Using the newly published Unpublished Letters and Telegrams of Hu Hanmin, supplemented by related documents and historical data in newspapers and magazines, this article tries to present the Southwest faction’s extremely complicated political environment, and expose the contradictory sentiments of Hu Hanmin and his followers caught in this difficult situation. By re-tracing the tracks of Hu Hanmin and his associates before and after the Fifth Plenary Session of the Guomindang Fourth National Congress, this article tries to avoid the pattern of past studies, which have tended to only follow the development of a single thread. The paper points out that in mid-1934 Hu Hanmin was trying to deploy a mass of contradictory policies in order to deal with the passive position of the Southwest faction: he wanted to attack Chiang Kai-shek militarily, but also wanted Chiang to give him a way out; he wanted to overthrow Chiang to resist Japan, but also wanted to overthrow Chiang with the help of Japan. While the “internal troubles” (within the faction) became more and more serious, the “external invasion” (from Chiang Kai-shek) came closer and closer. Caught amid these contradictions, Hu Hanmin could not choose his own course. Helpless, he hoped to take advantage of the Fifth National Congress to “get a solution from the Party” and “stage an offensive with the help of the Party”. However, contrary to his expectations, the act of holding his own Party Congress did not hurt the Central Committee of the Guomindang, but came close to breaking up Southwest faction instead. This situation should be the real story behind the “image” of the Southwest faction’s resistance against Chiang.

Reading The Discourse of Race in Modern China by Frank Dikotter Xie Wei (79)

Subjective Interpretation of Historical Materials and the Historian’s Value Judgment: A Reply to Mr. Fang Delin and to Ms. Jia Xiaoye Mao Haijian (91)

Catalog of Publications on Modern Chinese History in 2006 (108)

New Publication: Late Qing and Republican Economic History( 50 Vols.) (157)

责任编辑：国强 最后更新：2021-05-30 19:47:46

特别说明：抗日战争纪念网是一个记录和研究中国人民抗日战争历史的公益网站。本网注明稿件来源为其他媒体与网站的文/ 图等稿件均为转载稿，本网转载，并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性。本网转载出于非商业性的文化交流和科研之目的，如转载稿侵犯了您的版权，请告知本网及时撤除。以史实为镜鉴，揭侵略之罪恶；颂英烈之功勋，弘抗战之精神。我们要铭记抗战历史，弘扬抗战精神，坚定理想信念,为国家富强、民族复兴,实现伟大的中国梦作出新的贡献。感谢您对抗日战争纪念网的支持。
纠错电话：0731-85531328、19118928111(微信同号)

上一篇：《近代史研究》2007年第4期

下一篇：《近代史研究》2007年第6期